“Sometimes I wonder what would happen if we were all fully aware of our own passage through time.
To be able to confront the inevitability of linearity and recognize ourselves outside a predetermined temporality.
What would it be like to take a portion or segment—something defined by a beginning and an end—in which that spatiality, through an image or discourse, could be fragmented to generate new trajectories?
Why not think of geometry as a slow device, one that at times abandons its inherent speed in order to reconsider movement as something dense?
To also have the possibility of fixing our gaze on a concrete element, sometimes at the limit with others, and some in perfect solitude. Giving us time to reflect on its condition. Or perhaps to consider whether its existence is necessary”.

Painting, both as a visual language and as a process, enables me in my practice to appropriate and reconstruct those elements that persist within our everyday imaginary.

Through a synthesis of forms, the variability of supports, and a symbolic approach to the treatment of color, I conceive of painting as a fertile field between reflective thought, matter, and that state or temperamental nature of pictorial space within its own temporality.

Some of my approaches understand painting as illusion, situated between planimetry and volume through a surreal lens. They point toward the systemic, toward design as both image and concept through urban signage, as well as toward the configuration of emblematic architectures.

Furthermore, as a strategic device, I expand painting as an object: a possible corporeality traversed by social processes of an industrial nature.

Much of my production questions the symbolic character or weight of images and physical elements which, through their allegorical or discursive charge, reconfigure and condition our associative capacities for perceiving reality. It asks how we become involved with certain structures that modify our everyday actions, and perhaps invite us to naturalize the search for something abstract, unattainable—what we understand as artifice—which at the same time proves indispensable to us.

The question of the constant becoming of images, words, and objects as a phenomenon, with the intention of provoking intersections and tensions between what we recognize as art, culture, history, and progress.

Pablo Sinaí